Martindale Awards

Peer

Peer

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale Ratings

Average Peer Rating

Peer

4.5/5.0

Average Client Rating

Client

Reviews (18)

Rating Reviews by date
5.0 / 5.0
2013-05-01 10:17:21

Mr. Colborn is both practical and compassionate in dealing with landlord/tenant matters. He does excellent work.

— Peer 05/01/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2013-04-15 11:32:06

Jim is a competent and sound attorney. He is client-focused and dedicated to efficient, effective outcomes.

— Peer 04/15/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2013-04-22 12:37:10

No description provided

— Peer 04/22/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2013-04-18 07:23:31

I've come to know Jim over the years working in common areas of landlord-tenant disputes. Definitely knows his stuff, and I'm sure that translates to the other real estate related work he and his partner handle. I'm confident anyone thinking of hiring Jim would get fine representation.

— Peer 04/18/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2013-04-17 10:52:28

No description provided

— Peer 04/17/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2013-04-17 10:51:48

No description provided

— Peer 04/17/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2013-04-15 15:18:21

No description provided

— Peer 04/15/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2013-04-15 11:59:29

No description provided

— Peer 04/15/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2013-04-15 11:49:04

No description provided

— Peer 04/15/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2013-04-15 11:25:08

Great Lawyer

— Peer 04/15/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2012-03-12 11:55:40

No description provided

— Peer 03/12/2012

4.0 / 5.0
2013-04-23 08:25:06

No description provided

— Peer 04/23/2013

4.0 / 5.0
2013-04-15 10:32:48

He has been very professional and fair.

— Peer 04/15/2013

4.0 / 5.0
2009-11-02 10:58:08

No description provided

— Peer 11/02/2009

3.8 / 5.0
2013-04-15 11:10:42

No description provided

— Peer 04/15/2013

3.8 / 5.0
2011-12-14 11:20:23

No description provided

— Peer 12/14/2011

3.4 / 5.0
2013-04-16 16:46:28

Jim worked for me 11 years ago. He was a good associate.

— Peer 04/16/2013

3.0 / 5.0
2012-03-19 10:35:24

No description provided

— Peer 03/19/2012